See the Cat? See the Cradle?

I finished Kurt Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle. The themes Vonnegut develops throughout the story really dive into the thoughts that often overwhelm my thinking: "People tend to see what they want to, and read into what is there in reality. Religion is no exception to this." That is, people apply meaning to what would otherwise be meaningless. In Cat's Cradle, Vonnegut uses Bokononism (the religion he created for the text) to raise questions of the validity of any religion. Aspects of Bokononism seem so ridiculous while reading (although, some things make our hypocrisies so apparent). If not thinking from a culturally relative perspective, it is easy to look at Bokononism and question its validity, but by the end of the book we come to see why one would turn to it or come to believe in Bokononism. It could be a reason why one would turn to any religion. The protagonist states that he feels his karass (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karass) has been moving him all along to climbing a mountain. He sees Bokonon and reads something he wrote which solidifies this belief. Have you ever heard of a story where someone turns to Jesus Christ because of a near death experience in which he/she saw or spoke to god? Have you ever heard of someone turning to god because they were compelled to take some specific action that turned their life around? Whether because good things are happening or bad, people are look for a reason why. They want to place it an orderly arrangement, so maybe it will happen again or they can avoid it. Coincidences just don't have the same flair as religion. Even people who don't accept religion are looking for some explanation of coincidences: math (probability/chance), science, or supernatural explanations. We have so many methods of applying meaning in our world. Are any of them really valid? I think it is just human beings trying to make sense of this world in the only way we know how. We think about it. We think about what, how, why... We try to place it in some orderly arrangement so we can understand more things. The minds of most humans are prone to label making (explains our struggle with prejudices) and grouping. There are so many things in this world, it would be pretty difficult to get by if we couldn't place each individual within a larger group. The ability to make comparisons allows us to consolidate our thoughts and ideas so we can not only have more but function in day to day life as well. Well, I am obviously digressing from Cat's Cradle, but really these are all ideas stemming from those I share with what Vonnegut expressed in the book. Vonnegut is making his readers ask the question: Are any religious practices and assumptions really valid? And I extend that to say what about science, math, philosophy, etc (of course, these types of assumptions are not followed by specific practices generally)? These are all theories or ideas created by human beings (and so, inherently flawed as our perceptions and understanding are really so limited in the grand scheme of things). We see with our two little eyes what we can, the brain receives that information and attempts to make sense of it so we know what we're seeing, then we can think and think and think about it. How can one human being or even a group of human beings find the absolute answer to anything we see or think about?